<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"><base href="http://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_parliamentary_and_policy_update/2014-w07"><style id="article-content">
@media print {
.original-url {
display: none;
}
}
h1.title {
font-weight: normal;
font-size: 1.5em;
line-height: 1.25em;
color: rgb(75, 75, 75);
text-align: start;
-webkit-hyphens: manual;
}
blockquote {
color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
margin: 1em 30px 1em 30px;
font-weight: lighter;
}
.page a {
color: rgb(65, 110, 210);
}
.page a:visited {
color: rgb(65, 110, 210);
}
#article img {
border: 1px inset rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}
#article img.reader-image-tiny {
border: none;
}
#article .leading-image, #article figure, #article .auxiliary {
font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, sans-serif;
color: rgb(155, 155, 155);
}
.page {
font: 20px Georgia, serif;
line-height: 160%;
}
hr {
background: rgb(206, 206, 206);
height: 1px;
border: 0;
}
@media screen and (max-device-width: 480px) {
.page {
text-align: start;
}
}
</style><title>ORG parliamentary and policy update/2014-w07 - ORG Wiki</title></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><span class="Apple-Mail-URLShareWrapperClass" contenteditable="false"><span class="Apple-Mail-URLShareUserContentTopClass" style="line-height: 14px !important; color: black !important; text-align: left !important; " applecontenteditable="true"><br></span><span class="Apple-Mail-URLShareSharedContentClass" style="position: relative !important; " applecontenteditable="true"><base href="http://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_parliamentary_and_policy_update/2014-w07"><div><div class="original-url"><a href="http://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_parliamentary_and_policy_update/2014-w07">http://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_parliamentary_and_policy_update/2014-w07</a><br><br></div><div id="article" role="article" style="-webkit-locale: en; border-bottom-width: 0px;">
<!-- This node will contain a number of 'page' class divs. -->
<div class="page" style="font-family: Georgia, Palatino, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 25px;"><h1 class="title">ORG Parliamentary and policy update</h1><p>This is ORG's Parliamentary Update for the week beginning 10/02/2014
</p><p>If you are reading this online, you can also subscribe to the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/parliamentary.monitor">email version</a>.
</p>
<h2><span>Official Meetings</span></h2>
<p>Jim Killock met with the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/">Citizen's Advice Bureau</a>. He also gave an interview with Al Jazeera to discuss ORG's new campaign <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.dontspyonus.org.uk/org">Don't Spy on Us</a>.
</p><p>Peter Bradwell spoke at the UK <a href="/wiki/Internet_Governance_Forum" title="Internet Governance Forum">Internet Governance Forum</a> about child online protection.
</p>
<h2><span>Committees</span></h2>
<h3><span>New inquiry into real-time analysis of social media data</span></h3>
<p>The <a href="/wiki/Science_and_Technology_Committee_(Commons)" title="Science and Technology Committee (Commons)">Science and Technology Committee</a> has launched an inquiry into the benefits of using real-time analytics on social media data. They <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/news/140207-big-data-call-for-evidence/">describe</a> possible benefits as being "studying social processes as they unfold at the level of populations as an alternative to traditional surveys or interviews."
</p><p>The inquiry is accepting written submissions of evidence and is calling on those interested to answer questions including:
</p>
<dl>
<dd>"What are the ethical concerns of using personal data and how is this data anonymised for research?"
</dd>
<dd>"What impact is the upcoming EU Data Protection Legislation likely to have on access to social media data for research?"
</dd>
<dd>"Is UK legislation surrounding the collection and use of data fit for purpose?"
</dd>
</dl>
<p>Deadline for submission is Monday 31 March. Instructions and submission forms can be found on their <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/news/140207-big-data-call-for-evidence/">website</a>.
</p>
<h2><span>Debates and questions</span></h2>
<h3><span>Westminster Hall debate on "Supporting the Digital Economy"</span></h3>
<p>Thursday saw a debate in Westminster Hall discussing the topic "Supporting the Digital Economy". During the debate, the Vice-chair of the All-Party Intellectual Property Group, <a href="/wiki/John_Whittingdale_MP" title="John Whittingdale MP">John Whittingdale MP</a> suggested an alternative root to dealing with the delayed <a href="/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act_2010" title="Digital Economy Act 2010">Digital Economy Act 2010</a>. The Digital Economy Act is in effect, but there are still problems with getting statutory instruments to implement it. He suggested that when dealing with internet users who illegally share copyrighted material, a voluntary solution from <a href="/wiki/ISP" title="ISP"> ISPs</a> and rights owners be used instead of mandatory legislation. He <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140213/halltext/140213h0001.htm#140213h0001.htm_spnew72">said</a> "A voluntary copyright alert programme would involve an agreement between the rights owners and the ISPs that there would be a system through which letters were issued to those identified as illegally downloading."
</p><p>Westminster Hall debates are informal debates that give the opportunity to MPs to discuss important matters in more depth.
</p>
<h2><span>International Developments</span></h2>
<h3><span>US Senator launches petition to issue pardon for Edward Snowden</span></h3>
<p>Senator Ron Paul has started a <a rel="nofollow" href="https://campaign.ronpaulchannel.com/snowden/petition/">petition</a> demanding a pardon for Edward Snowden. In a statement he <a rel="nofollow" href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/198325-ron-paul-launches-clemency-for-snowden-petititon">said</a> “Edward Snowden sacrificed his livelihood, citizenship, and freedom by exposing the disturbing scope of the NSA’s worldwide spying program. Thanks to one man’s courageous actions, Americans know about the truly egregious ways their government is spying on them”.
</p>
<h3><span>Science channel on YouTube facing termination after DMCA issued by film-makers</span></h3>
<p>A popular <a href="/wiki/YouTube" title="YouTube">YouTube</a> channel featuring 'science facts' and 'sceptical/debunking' videos, may be <a rel="nofollow" href="http://mylespower.co.uk/">permanently removed</a> from the site and the creator of the channel will be barred from opening a new account. The decision comes after two Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) take-down requests were issued by the creators of the film "House of Numbers". The DMCA is an American law that implements the two copyright treaties of the <a href="/wiki/United_Nations" title="United Nations"> United Nation's</a> <a href="/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Organisation" title="World Intellectual Property Organisation">World Intellectual Property Organisation</a>.
</p><p>The film aims to explore the issues of HIV and has been criticised by <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/sep/26/ben-goldacre-bad-science-aids">doctors</a> (<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.houseofnumbers.org/Scientists_Denounce_HON.html">including those interviewed</a>) as misrepresenting their views and the facts.
</p><p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/user/powerm1985?feature=watch">Myles Power</a> (alias of channel owner) created a series of videos exposing the arguments of the film. The significance of the case lies in the claims between those involved. The film-makers issued DMCA take-down requests, under claims of copyright for showing clips of the film in his videos. Myles Power claims the use of film material came under fair-use and was used for educational purposes. Since there are other videos on YouTube featuring the full-length film, that haven't been issued take-down notices, critics claim the intention is to censor opposing views.
</p>
<h2><span>European Union</span></h2>
<h3><span>European court finds that hyperlinks do not constitute copyright infringement, in cases of freely available materials</span></h3>
<p>The <a href="/wiki/European_Court_of_Justice" title="European Court of Justice">European Court of Justice (ECJ)</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://torrentfreak.com/hyperlinking-is-not-copyright-infringement-eu-court-rules-140213/">ruled</a>, in a new case, that featuring hyperlinks on websites does not constitute copyright infringement.
</p><p>The case was brought to the ECJ from the Swedish Court of the Appeal. It involved a website that indexed links to articles freely available on the internet. Some journalists, whose articles were linked to, felt they deserved reimbursement from the indexing site. However, the ECJ ruled, they didn't owe any reimbursement, as the site was not 'creating a new audience', since the articles were freely available at the original source. In the words of the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=147847&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=7778">ruling</a>:
</p>
<dl>
<dd>"In the circumstances of this case, it must be observed that making available the works concerned by means of a clickable link, such as that in the main proceedings, does not lead to the works in question being communicated to a new public” “Therefore, since there is no new public, the authorization of the copyright holders is not required for a communication to the public such as that in the main proceedings."
</dd>
</dl>
<p>However, it should be noted the ruling permits hyperlinks as long as it doesn't offer access of copyrighted material to a 'new public'. The ruling defines 'new public' as those who wouldn't have access to the original material, by the original creators, due to subscriber restrictions.
</p>
<h2><span>Law and Legal Cases</span></h2>
<h3><span>Decision by German court finds domain registrar responsible for website's copyright infringement</span></h3>
<p>In a case between music label Universal and a German domain registrar over the latter's hosting of a torrent tracking website, the German regional court <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2095740/german-court-finds-domain-registrar-liable-for-torrent-sites-copyright-infringement.html">found</a> the domain registrar responsible for the actions of the hosted site. The torrent site in question, hosted links to locations where music owned by Universal could be illegally downloaded.
</p><p>The court maintained the domain registrar should have investigated the site in question after they were issued a series of infringement notifications.
</p><p>The registrar's general counsel, Volker Gerimann, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2095740/german-court-finds-domain-registrar-liable-for-torrent-sites-copyright-infringement.html">said</a> of the verdict "If left unchallenged, this decision would constitute an undue expansion of the legal obligations of each registrar based in Germany, endangering the entire business model of registering domain names or performing DNS addressing for third parties".
</p>
<h2><span>Political Parties</span></h2>
<h3><span>Ed Miliband calls for debate on intelligence agencies at same magnitude as US</span></h3>
<p>The Labour party's leader. <a href="/wiki/Ed_Miliband_MP" title="Ed Miliband MP"> Ed Miliband</a> has <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/10/ed-miliband-britain-intelligence-agencies?CMP=twt_gu">made calls</a> for a debate on oversight of the intelligence agencies with the same vigour as it has taken place in the US. He said that reforming oversight bodies of <a href="/wiki/GCHQ" title="GCHQ">GCHQ</a>, <a href="/wiki/MI6" title="MI6">MI6</a> and <a href="/wiki/MI5" title="MI5">MI5</a> would be part of his campaign in challenging 'unaccountable power'. He did state however that the ongoing reviews into oversight by the <a href="/wiki/Intelligence_and_Security_Committee" title="Intelligence and Security Committee">Intelligence and Security Committee</a> and the <a href="/wiki/Interception_of_Communications_Commissioner" title="Interception of Communications Commissioner">Interception of Communications Commissioner</a> were important.
</p><p>He also said he would reform the way <a href="/wiki/NHS" title="NHS">NHS</a> patient information will be processed, stating that he would appoint a 'patient committee' to weigh in on changes to the National Health Service.
</p>
<h2><span>Commercial Stakeholders</span></h2>
<h3><span>Representatives from UK adult content industry launch site to educate on appropriate filters</span></h3>
<p>Groups of the UK's adult content industry (and two age verification companies), have <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/13/uk-pornographers-isp-filters">banded</a> together to raise awareness about the faulty filtering services, offered by the five main <a href="/wiki/ISP" title="ISP">ISPs</a>. They argue the new filtering systems do not work, wrongly filter sex-education sites, as well as other educational websites, and fail to filter out adult content. They <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/uk-pornographers-launch-new-site-in-response-to-overblocking-internet-filters-9127559.html">argue</a> “There are better filters available than those offered by the ISPs which are also less prone to overblocking.”
</p><p>Through the launch of a site called <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.xxxaware.co.uk/%7C">xxxaware.co.uk</a>, they aim to educate parents of the importance of online protection from inappropriate content, while also protecting legitimate content.
</p>
<h2><span>ORG Media coverage</span></h2>
<p>See <a href="/wiki/ORG_Press_Coverage" title="ORG Press Coverage">ORG Press Coverage</a> for full details.
</p>
<h2><span>ORG contact details</span></h2>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff">Staff page</a>
</p>
<ul>
<li> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#jim">Jim Killock, Executive Director</a>
</li>
<li> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#peter">Peter Bradwell, Policy</a>
</li>
<li> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#javier">Javier Ruiz, Campaigns</a>
</li>
<li> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#lee">Lee Maguire, Tech</a>
</li>
</ul>
<!--
NewPP limit report
CPU time usage: 0.032 seconds
Real time usage: 0.035 seconds
Preprocessor visited node count: 71/1000000
Preprocessor generated node count: 76/1000000
Post‐expand include size: 0/2097152 bytes
Template argument size: 0/2097152 bytes
Highest expansion depth: 2/40
Expensive parser function count: 0/100
-->
<!-- Saved in parser cache with key mediawiki_public_live-orgwiki:pcache:idhash:8687-0!*!0!!en!*!* and timestamp 20140214175638
-->
</div></div></div></span><span class="Apple-Mail-URLShareUserContentBottomClass" style="line-height: 14px !important; color: black !important; text-align: left !important; " applecontenteditable="true"><br></span></span></body></html>