<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2017-w39"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2017-w39</a>
<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-forward-container">
<h1 class="entry-title" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0) !important;
margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0.5em 0px 0px; line-height: 1.2em;
font-weight: normal; clear: both; font-size: 2.4em; display:
block; font-family: Rosarivo, Georgia, serif; font-style:
normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps:
normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left;
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal;
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252); text-decoration-style:
initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">ORG policy
update/2017-w39</h1>
<div id="bodyContent" class="entry-content" style="font-size:
18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom:
1.5em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Rosarivo, Georgia,
serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal;
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing:
normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(252, 252,
252); text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
initial;">
<div id="mw-content-text" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;" lang="en">This is ORG's Policy Update
for the week beginning 25/09/2017.<br>
If you are reading this online, you can also subscribe to the<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/parliamentary.monitor"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">email version or unsubscribe</a>.<br>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="ORG.E2.80.99s_work">ORG’s
work</span></h3>
<ul>
<li>ORG Scotland submitted a response to the consultation
lead by the Independent Advisory Group on Biometrics. Read
the full response on why Scotland needs a biometrics
commissioner<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://scotland.openrightsgroup.org/policy/2017/09/29/regulating-the-use-of-biometrics-across-scotland/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">here</a>.</li>
<li>Save the date for ORGCon 2017 - it will take place on
Saturday 4 November at Friends House on Euston Road in
London. We have a second smaller event planned on Sunday 5
November in a different location (TBC). This year is all
about the Digital Fightback. Confirmed speakers include
Graham Linehan, Noel Sharkey, Helen Lewis, Jamie Bartlett
and Nanjira Sambuli.<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://orgcon.openrightsgroup.org/" style="color:
rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Tickets are on sale now</a>!</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Planned local group events:</p>
<ul>
<li>Join<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external
text"
href="https://www.meetup.com/ORG-Glasgow/events/243106505/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">ORG Glasgow</a><span> </span>for
a free screening of The Internet’s Own Boy on 2 October.
The Internet’s Own Boy tells the life story of programmer,
writer, political and internet activist Aaron Swartz, an
internet pioneer and free speech campaigner. Following the
screening, Scotland Director Matthew Rice will be
available for a discussion and will give information about
how to get involved in initiatives in Glasgow and
Scotland.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.meetup.com/ORG-Cambridge/events/243160003/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">ORG Cambridge</a><span> </span>would
like to invite you to join them on 3 October for their
monthly meetup to discuss the current state of digital
rights, what we've done in the past month, and what we are
planning to do in the upcoming months.</li>
<li>Join<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external
text"
href="https://www.meetup.com/ORG-Edinburgh/events/243523585/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">ORG Edinburgh</a><span> </span>and
the Open Government Network for an event on 5 October on
the history of identity debates in Scotland and the UK.
Our speakers will talk about the current situation and
status of government proposals, and will discuss people's
concerns before meeting with the Government.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.meetup.com/ORG-London/events/243072098/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">ORG London</a><span> </span>is
organising an informal pub gathering on 10 October with
Myles Jackman to discuss the current state of digital
rights legislation in the UK, including the progress of
the Digital Economy Act.</li>
</ul>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Official_meetings">Official
meetings</span></h3>
<ul>
<li>Javier Ruiz attended a discussion with Liam Byrne
organised by Demos and the Guardian.</li>
<li>Jim Killock attended a meeting with Julie Grant,
Australian eSafety Commissioner, regarding the online
safety agenda and the problems encountered in the UK.</li>
</ul>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="UK_Parliament">UK Parliament</span></h3>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Both Houses of Parliament are
on recess and will be back after party conferences on 10
October.</p>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Second_Reading_of_the_DPBill_will_be_on_10_October">Second
Reading of the DPBill will be on 10 October</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Data Protection Bill is
due to be debated in the Second Reading in the House of
Lords on 10 October.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">ORG has been concerned about
the draft Bill not containing provisions allowing
independent privacy organisations to raise complaints
without naming data subjects. Article 80(2) of the EU’s
General Data Protection Regulation is a derogation (option)
that would allow it but the UK decided not to include it in
the Bill. Such a provision would help investigate harmful
data processing practices.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Bill will allow people to
lodge a complaint themselves or designate a qualifying
organisation to file a complaint on their behalf. However
affected data subjects are not always willing to come
forward as they might not wish to be publicly associated
with certain companies. This is where independent privacy
organisations would come in to uphold people’s right to
privacy. The current data protection landscape could
accommodate independent privacy groups that would be able to
tackle this gap in consumer protection.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">For a more detailed analysis
of the draft DPBill read this<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="http://amberhawk.typepad.com/amberhawk/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">blog post by Amberhawk</a>.</p>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Other_national_developments">Other
national developments</span></h3>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="TfL_is_consulting_on_permanently_collecting_customers.E2.80.99_data_on_the_underground">TfL
is consulting on permanently collecting customers’ data on
the underground</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Transport for London (TfL)
intends to make £322 million by collecting and possibly
selling commuters’ location data. TfL ran a<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/news-articles/save-the-data-for-transport-trial"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">data collection trial at the end of
2016</a>. During the trial, they tracked wifi signals from
people’s devices who moved around the London Underground.
(Read our<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external
text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2016/tfl-needs-to-give-passengers-the-full-picture-on-wifi-collection-scheme"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">blog from November 2016</a>when the
trial ran.)</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">At the time, TfL had said the
collected data from 5.6 million users would be used to
improve customer experience. They claimed the data is
anonymised, however, during the trial, the data was merely
pseudonymised meaning that data could eventually be
identifiable.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">TfL is currently in
consultation about running data tracking on a permanent
basis.</p>
<a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://news.sky.com/story/tfl-may-make-322m-by-selling-on-data-from-passengers-mobiles-via-tube-wifi-11056118"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Sky received a response to a Freedom
of Information request</a><span> </span>which revealed that
TfL also anticipates a significant financial benefit to be one
of the results of the scheme. The document obtained by Sky
said that the scheme will enable
<blockquote style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left;
line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">”TfL to achieve
£322m revenue generation over the next eight years by being
able to quantify asset value based on the number of
eyeballs/impressions and dynamically trade advertising
space."</blockquote>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">This goal is not reflected in
the messaging to the public which concentrates only on
improvements to the customer experience. This discrepancy
between the TfL’s goal and the public message could be
considered misleading. TfL’s customers are limited to opting
out of the scheme only by disabling their wifi whilst using
the London Underground. For this reason, it is essential
people are fully aware of the extent and use of the
collected data.</p>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Scotland">Scotland</span></h3>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Police_Scotland_placed_400.2C000_people_on_the_Vulnerable_Persons_Database">Police
Scotland placed 400,000 people on the Vulnerable Persons
Database</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">An<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-41335762"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">investigation conducted by the BBC</a><span> </span>revealed
that more than 400,000 have been placed onto the Vulnerable
Persons Database in Scotland. Officers who attend incidents
and crimes can add people to the database if they consider
them to be at risk of future harm.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The database was created to
collate different pieces of information about a particularly
vulnerable individual into a single file. This would allow
officers to get a more complex image of a person. The file
can be shared with other government bodies at a supervisor’s
discretion.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Information Commissioner
found the database in breach of the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Data_Protection_Act_1998"
title="Data Protection Act 1998" style="color: rgb(0, 80,
156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Data
Protection Act 1998</a><span> </span>due to the lack of
rules for removing information from the database.
Additionally, people were not notified they are on the
system.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Police Scotland is currently
in a conversation with the Information Commissioner to
rectify the breach of the DPA. Their conduct diminished
people’s right to privacy. To make the database fit for
purpose Police Scotland should notify the people on the
database and give them means to request removal from it.</p>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Europe">Europe</span></h3>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="European_Commission_wants_to_privatise_online_censorship">European
Commission wants to privatise online censorship</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/European_Commission"
title="European Commission" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">European
Commission</a><span> </span>published the<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2017/EN/COM-2017-555-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Tackling Illegal Content Online
communication</a><span> </span>this week. The document
puts a lot of focus on Internet companies to remove illegal
content online that they could consider illegal.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The communication contradicts
the Commission’s proposed Copyright Directive in the way
Internet service providers are perceived. The Copyright
Directive considers hosting services that carry content in
any way “active” - they are presumed to be aware of illegal
activities. The communication does not consider ISPs to be
in a position where they would have knowledge of illegal
content.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Commission’s communication
puts the importance on speed and proportion of removals. It
appears that the question of whether the content is actually
illegal is secondary. The Commission intends to help the
removal of illegal content by incorporating “trusted
flaggers” in takedowns. “Trusted flaggers” are organisations
which can be trusted to submit relevant complaints about
illegal content.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Commission’s proposal
appears to fully embrace privatisation of online censorship
and disregards the impacts of doing so.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/EDRi"
title="EDRi" class="mw-redirect" style="color: rgb(0, 80,
156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">EDRi</a><span> </span>offers
a more in-depth analysis of the Commission’s communication<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://edri.org/commissions-position-tackling-illegal-content-online-contradictory-dangerous-free-speech/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">here</a>.</p>
<h3><span class="mw-headline"
id="Questions_in_the_UK_Parliament">Questions in the UK
Parliament</span></h3>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Question_on_the_CJEU_judgment_in_the_Schrems_case">Question
on the CJEU judgment in the Schrems case</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Lord Laird<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-09-14.HL1614.h&s=%22data+protection%22#gHL1614.q0"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">asked</a><span> </span>the
Government, what steps they have taken to implement the
judgment and findings of the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/European_Court_of_Justice"
title="European Court of Justice" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">European Court of Justice</a><span> </span>(CJEU)
in the Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner case.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Lord Ashton of Hyde responded
that the European Commission's adequacy decision on the Safe
Harbor Agreement on personal data transfers was invalidated
by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in the Schrems
case. The EU-US Privacy Shield decision has since replaced
the Safe Harbor agreement.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Lord Ashton noted that the
Information Commissioner provides regular updates to the
status of Privacy Shield and is an active member of the
Article 29 Working Party Privacy Shield annual joint review
team.</p>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Question_on_the_Privacy_Shield">Question on the
Privacy Shield</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Lord Laird<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-09-14.HL1613.h&s=%22data+protection%22"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">asked</a><span> </span>the
Government, whether they have received a legal opinion on
the Privacy Shield agreement between the EU and the US and
whether they sought independent legal advice.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Lord Ashton responded that the
Government does not intend to comment on or publish any
legal advice they may have received on these matters.</p>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Question_on_online_terrorist_material">Question on
online terrorist material</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Jeremy_Lefroy_MP"
title="Jeremy Lefroy MP" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Jeremy
Lefroy MP</a><span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-09-04.7580.h&s=%28internet+OR+cyber+OR+computer+OR+web+OR+surveillance+OR+copywrite+OR+%22data+sharing%22%29#g7580.r0"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">asked</a><span> </span>the
Secretary of State for the Home Department, among other
things, how many pieces of unlawful terrorist material have
been removed from the Internet.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Ben_Wallace_MP"
title="Ben Wallace MP" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Ben Wallace
MP</a><span> </span>responded that the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Counter_Terrorism_Internet_Referral_Unit"
title="Counter Terrorism Internet Referral Unit"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Counter Terrorism Internet Referral
Unit</a><span> </span>(CTIRU) referred 280,000 pieces of
illegal terrorist material since February 2010 to social
media providers which proceeded to remove it.</p>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="ORG_media_coverage">ORG
media coverage</span></h3>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><i>See<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_Press_Coverage"
title="ORG Press Coverage" style="color: rgb(0, 80,
156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">ORG
Press Coverage</a><span> </span>for full details.</i></p>
<dl>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-09-21-IB Times-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://www.ibtimes.com/eu-buried-study-found-no-impact-piracy-entertainment-industry-2592661"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">EU Buried Study That Found No
Impact From Piracy On Entertainment Industry</a></dt>
<dd>Author: AJ Dellinger</dd>
<dd>Summary: ORG mentioned in relation to the criticism of
EU copyright reform.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Copyright"
title="Copyright" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Copyright</a>,<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/European_Union"
title="European Union" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">European
Union</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-09-21-Information Age-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://www.information-age.com/whatsapp-rejected-uk-gov-request-access-encrypted-messages-123468667/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">WhatsApp rejected UK Gov request
to access encrypted messages</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Nick Ismail</dd>
<dd>Summary: Jim Killock quoted on automated takedowns of
online content inevitably leading to mistakes.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Online_censorship"
title="Online censorship" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Online censorship</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-09-26-The Inquirer-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/3018107/campaigner-found-guilty-under-terror-laws-for-not-disclosing-passwords"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Campaigner found guilty under
terrorism laws for not disclosing passwords</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Dave Neal</dd>
<dd>Summary: Jim Killock quoted on powers under Schedule 7
of the Terrorism Act being blanket powers not requiring
suspicion.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Terrorism_Act_2000"
title="Terrorism Act 2000" style="color: rgb(0, 80,
156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Terrorism
Act 2000</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-09-27-Raconteur-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.raconteur.net/finance/should-tech-companies-enforce-law"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Should tech companies enforce
law?</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Matthew Chapman</dd>
<dd>Summary: Pam Cowburn quoted on international tech
companies declining service potentially having effect on
free speech.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Online_censorship"
title="Online censorship" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Online censorship</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-09-27-Gears of Biz-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://gearsofbiz.com/campaigner-found-guilty-under-terrorism-laws-for-not-disclosing-passwords/87365"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Campaigner found guilty under
terrorism laws for not disclosing passwords</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Helen Clark</dd>
<dd>Summary: Jim Killock quoted on powers under Schedule 7
of the Terrorism Act being blanket powers not requiring
suspicion.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Terrorism_Act_2000"
title="Terrorism Act 2000" style="color: rgb(0, 80,
156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Terrorism
Act 2000</a></dd>
</dl>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="ORG_Contact_Details">ORG
Contact Details</span></h3>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Staff page</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#jim"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Jim Killock, Executive Director</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#javier"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Javier Ruiz, Policy</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#ed"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Ed Johnson-Williams, Campaigns</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#pam"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Pam Cowburn, Communications</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#lee"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Lee Maguire, Tech</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#myles"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Myles Jackman, Legal Director</a></li>
<li>Matthew Rice, Scotland Director</li>
<li>Slavka Bielikova, Policy Officer</li>
<li>Mike Morel, Communications Officer</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>