<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-forward-container">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2017-w40"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2017-w40</a><br>
<h1 class="entry-title" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0) !important;
margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0.5em 0px 0px; line-height: 1.2em;
font-weight: normal; clear: both; font-size: 2.4em; display:
block; font-family: Rosarivo, Georgia, serif; font-style:
normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps:
normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left;
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal;
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252); text-decoration-style:
initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">ORG policy
update/2017-w40</h1>
<div id="bodyContent" class="entry-content" style="font-size:
18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom:
1.5em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Rosarivo, Georgia,
serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal;
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing:
normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(252, 252,
252); text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
initial;">
<div id="mw-content-text" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;" lang="en">
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">This is ORG's Policy Update
for the week beginning 02/10/2017.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">If you are reading this
online, you can also subscribe to the<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/parliamentary.monitor"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">email version or unsubscribe</a>.</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="ORG.E2.80.99s_work">ORG’s
work</span></h2>
<ul>
<li>Save the date for ORGCon 2017 - it will take place on
Saturday 4 November at Friends House on Euston Road in
London. We have a second smaller event planned on Sunday 5
November in a different location (TBC). This year is all
about the Digital Fightback. Confirmed speakers include
Graham Linehan, Noel Sharkey, Helen Lewis, Jamie Bartlett
and Nanjira Sambuli.<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://orgcon.openrightsgroup.org/" style="color:
rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Tickets are on sale now</a>!</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Planned local group events:</p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.meetup.com/ORG-London/events/243072098/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">ORG London</a><span> </span>is
organising an informal pub gathering on 10 October with
Myles Jackman to discuss the current state of digital
rights legislation in the UK, including the progress of
the Digital Economy Act.</li>
<li>Join<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external
text"
href="https://www.meetup.com/ORG-Edinburgh/events/243657362/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">ORG Edinburgh</a><span> </span>for
a free screening of The Internet’s Own Boy - the life
story of programmer, writer, political and internet
activist Aaron Swartz on 11 October. Following the
screening, our Scotland Director Matthew Rice will be
available to discuss ORG’s work.</li>
</ul>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Official_meetings">Official
meetings</span></h2>
<ul>
<li>Javier Ruiz attended a meeting organised by the<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://royalsociety.org/" style="color: rgb(0,
80, 156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Royal
Society</a><span> </span>and the Government Digital
Service (GDS) to review the<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-science-ethical-framework"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Data Science Ethical Framework</a>.</li>
<li>Jim Killock attended a roundtable meeting organised by
the<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://globalnetworkinitiative.org/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Global Network Initiative</a><span> </span>on
how governments can most effectively address concerns
about content and protect human rights.</li>
</ul>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="UK_Parliament">UK Parliament</span></h2>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="DPBill_will_be_read_second_time_next_week">DPBill will
be read second time next week</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2017-2019/0066/lbill_2017-20190066_en_1.htm"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Data Protection Bill</a><span> </span>is
due to be debated in the Second Reading in the House of
Lords on 10 October.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><br>
<i>Article 80(2)</i></p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">We have previously raised our
concerns about the draft Bill not containing provisions
allowing independent privacy organisations to raise
complaints without naming data subjects. Article 80(2) of
the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation is a derogation
(option) that would allow it, but the UK decided not to
include it in the Bill. Such a provision would help
investigate harmful data processing practices.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Bill will allow people to
lodge a complaint themselves or designate a qualifying
organisation to file a complaint on their behalf. However
affected data subjects are not always willing to come
forward as they might not wish to be publicly associated
with certain companies.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><br>
<i>The lack of “representative”</i></p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Another issue arising from the
draft Bill is the removal of “representative” from the text.
Originally, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation
covers the processing of personal data of EU data subjects
by data controllers (companies) not established in the EU.
In such circumstances, the EU requires companies who are
based outside of the EU but wish to offer services to people
in the EU to establish a representative in a Member State.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The DPBill draft does not
include the need for a “representative” and as such it will
not be possible to enforce all rights and obligations on
non-UK companies offering services to the people in the UK
if something goes wrong.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">For more details read the<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://amberhawk.typepad.com/amberhawk/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">blog post by Amberhawk</a>.</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Other_national_developments">Other
national developments</span></h2>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Viewing_websites_or_media_streams_of_terror_propaganda_will_be_a_criminal_offence">Viewing
websites or media streams of terror propaganda will be a
criminal offence</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/law-tightened-to-target-terrorists-use-of-the-internet"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Home Office announced that
counter-terrorism laws will be updated</a><span> </span>and
will include an offence of repeatedly viewing terrorist
content online. The offence could result in a 15-year jail
sentence.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/news/89511/streaming-terror-propaganda-online-will-be"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">updated law is the Government’s
effort to tackle online radicalisation</a>. The changes
will strengthen offence defined in Section 58 of the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Terrorism_Act_2000"
title="Terrorism Act 2000" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Terrorism
Act 2000</a>. Section 58 applies to online material which
has been downloaded and stored on the offender’s computer,
saved on another device or printed.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The new offence will apply to
material that is viewed repeatedly or streamed online.
Additionally, the maximum penalty will be increased from 10
to 15 years.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The new wording of the offence
raises serious questions about safeguards for the general
public and people who view the material for legitimate
reasons. Journalists, anti-terror campaigners, academics and
others may need to view extremist content frequently. The
law may dissuade potential informants from coming forwards
because they are already criminalised.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">In their statement, the Home
Office said that the offence will ensure that the defence
for viewing material by mistake or out of curiosity without
a criminal intent is available, as well as “reasonable
excuse” defence which applies to journalists, academics, and
others with a legitimate interest.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Max Hill QC, the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Independent_Reviewer_of_Terrorism_Legislation"
title="Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Independent Reviewer of Terrorism
Legislation</a>, regards the announcement by the Home
Secretary<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Amber_Rudd_MP"
title="Amber Rudd MP" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Amber Rudd
MP</a><span> </span>as merely an update to an already
existing offence, not a new offence altogether.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">However, Hill<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://terrorismlegislationreviewer.independent.gov.uk/law-tightened-to-target-terrorists-use-of-the-internet/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">stresses it is important that the
amended version of Section 58 does not indict individuals</a>based
upon the content of the internet cache on their computers.
Upon viewing terrorist video material online once, a website
might cause multiple news stories/images to be stored in the
laptop user’s cache, and the new offence should not
encompass this situation.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">He further identified that the
“repeated view” of terrorist material will cause problems
when attempting to define how many views constitute
“repeated” view with a criminal intent.</p>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Home_Office_to_crack_down_on_online_child_sexual_abuse_with_new_technology">Home
Office to crack down on online child sexual abuse with new
technology</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Home Office made another<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home-office-to-crack-down-on-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-new-cutting-edge-technology"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">announcement this week regarding a
new technology they plan to use to tackle online child
sexual abuse</a>.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Government has made an
investment of £600,000 in technology that will allow
Internet companies to identify and remove indecent images of
children from websites at an “unprecedented rate”.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The technology, Project
Arachnid, uses lists of digital fingerprints (hashes) to
search known illegal images and issue removal notices to the
websites that host them. Internet and social media companies
will be able to use a plugin to implement it in their
systems.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The project could address
parts of the Home Secretary’s (<a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Amber_Rudd_MP"
title="Amber Rudd MP" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Amber Rudd
MP</a>) criticism this week who said that<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-security-whatsapp/uk-says-whatsapp-lets-paedophiles-and-gangsters-operate-beyond-the-law-idUSKCN1C8165"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">paedophiles use end-to-end services
(like WhatsApp) to communicate beyond the reach of law
enforcement</a>.</p>
Rudd said she does not
<blockquote style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left;
line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">“accept it is
right that companies should allow them and other criminals
to operate beyond the reach of law enforcement. “We must
require the industry to move faster and more aggressively.
They have the resources and there must be greater urgency.”</blockquote>
She continued to<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-politics-41463401"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">complain about the attitude tech
companies</a><span> </span>show when asked to compromise
encryption they use to protect their users. Rudd explained
that she does not
<blockquote style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left;
line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">"need to
understand how encryption works to understand how it's
helping the criminals.”</blockquote>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Investigatory_Powers_Tribunal_consultation">Investigatory
Powers Tribunal consultation</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Investigatory_Powers_Tribunal"
title="Investigatory Powers Tribunal" style="color: rgb(0,
80, 156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Investigatory
Powers Tribunal</a><span> </span>launched a consultation
on<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/648591/20170928_IPT_rules_changes_-_covering_consultation_document_Final_FOR_PU.pdf"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">updated rules</a><span> </span>(pdf)
governing proceedings and complaints at the Investigatory
Powers Tribunal.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Investigatory Powers
Tribunal Rules 2000 set out the procedures the IPT should
follow. The consultation closes 10 November.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">To respond to the consultation
follow this<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external
text"
href="https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/investigatory-powers-tribunal-consultation-updated-rules"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">link</a>.</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Europe">Europe</span></h2>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Germany.E2.80.99s_new_online_hate_speech_code">Germany’s
new online hate speech code</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">New<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://www.politico.eu/article/hate-speech-germany-twitter-facebook-google-fines/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">rules on policing online hate
speech</a><span> </span>in Germany took effect 1 October.
The law is supposed to target Internet companies such as
Facebook, Twitter, and Google.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Internet companies are
required by the<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/Dokumente/NetzDG_engl.pdf"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">new law</a><span> </span>to remove
illegal content from their platforms within 24 hours. If
they consistently fail to do so they could face fines of up
to €50 million. The law is placing more responsibility of
policing the Internet on companies. This approach is in line
with other initiatives in the UK and France.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">According to the<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://twitter.com/BMJV_Bund/status/841583050324639744"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">reports</a>, Facebook and Twitter
failed to remove 70% of online hate speech within 24 hours
of being notified by users. On the other hand, Google met
the criteria for removing the illegal content.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Internet companies will need
to hire representatives who will inform local authorities
about the company’s efforts to remove potential hate speech
material. The benchmark of removing content within 24 hours
is supposed to apply only in the most egregious cases. If
there is a doubt whether content should be removed,
companies will have seven days to make their decision.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Additionally, Internet
companies are expected to create avenues for their users to
easily make reports of online hate speech. The changes
should be made public by early 2018.</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="ORG_media_coverage">ORG
media coverage</span></h2>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><i>See<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_Press_Coverage"
title="ORG Press Coverage" style="color: rgb(0, 80,
156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">ORG
Press Coverage</a><span> </span>for full details.</i></p>
<dl>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-09-28-The Inquirer-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/3018264/tfl-denies-it-wants-to-sell-passenger-data-collected-through-wifi-tracking-scheme"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">TfL denies it wants to sell
passenger data collected via WiFi tracking scheme</a></dt>
<dd>Author: John Leonard</dd>
<dd>Summary: ORG mentioned in relation to the TfL’s plans to
collect and sell their customers’ wifi data.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Data_protection"
title="Data protection" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Data
protection</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-10-02-New Statesman-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://tech.newstatesman.com/news/eu-fines-social-media-firms-hate-speech"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">EU threatens to impose fines on
tech firms that fail to combat hate speech</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Oscar Williams</dd>
<dd>Summary: Jim Killock quoted on automated takedowns of
extremist material will inevitably lead to mistakes being
made.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Online_censorship"
title="Online censorship" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Online censorship</a>,<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/European_Union"
title="European Union" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">European
Union</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-10-03-BuzzFeed-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/amber-laws-extremism?utm_term=.fiv0B77XWj#.moREJmmqve"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Amber Rudd's Plan To Jail People
Who Repeatedly View Extremist Material Is Being
Lambasted By Campaigners</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Mark Di Stefano, James Ball</dd>
<dd>Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the government’s plans
for new laws to criminalise streaming of extremist content
being dangerous.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Online_censorship"
title="Online censorship" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Online censorship</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-10-02-Boing Boing-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://boingboing.net/2017/10/02/you-are-the-product-2.html"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">The London Underground thinks it
can sell travelers' attention and wifi data for £322m</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Cory Doctorow</dd>
<dd>Summary: Maria Farrell quoted on TfL not only using
collected WiFi data to improve customer service but also
to exploit it for revenue.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Data_protection"
title="Data protection" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Data
protection</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-10-03-Daily Mail-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4945088/Kodi-slams-TVAddons-Twitter-saying-shut-down.html"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Kodi slams TVAddons streaming
library on Twitter saying it should be 'shut down
because it brings misery to everyone'</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Phoebe Weston</dd>
<dd>Summary: ORG mentioned in relation to a letter sent to
the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Intellectual_Property_Office"
title="Intellectual Property Office" style="color:
rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Intellectual Property Office</a><span> </span>regarding
the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act_2017"
title="Digital Economy Act 2017" style="color: rgb(0,
80, 156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Digital
Economy Act 2017</a></dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Copyright"
title="Copyright" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Copyright</a>,<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act_2017"
title="Digital Economy Act 2017" style="color: rgb(0,
80, 156); text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Digital
Economy Act 2017</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-10-03-New Statesman-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://tech.newstatesman.com/news/tech-experts-hit-back-amber-rudd"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Tech experts hit back after Amber
Rudd says they are sneering and patronising</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Oscar Williams</dd>
<dd>Summary: Jim Killock quoted on allowing the Government
to access encrypted messages would move criminals off law
abiding platforms onto the dark web.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Online_censorship"
title="Online censorship" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Online censorship</a>,<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Encryption"
title="Encryption" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Encryption</a>,<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Security"
title="Security" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Security</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-10-03-PCR Online-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://www.pcr-online.biz/news/read/amber-rudd-slams-patronising-tech-experts-as-she-admits-she-doesn-t-understand-encryption/039740"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Amber Rudd slams 'patronising'
tech experts as she admits she doesn't understand
encryption</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Rob Horgan</dd>
<dd>Summary: Alec Muffett quoted on the government wasting
their time on banning encryption.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Online_censorship"
title="Online censorship" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Online censorship</a>,<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Encryption"
title="Encryption" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Encryption</a>,<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Security"
title="Security" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;" moz-do-not-send="true">Security</a></dd>
</dl>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="ORG_Contact_Details">ORG
Contact Details</span></h2>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height:
1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Staff page</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#jim"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Jim Killock, Executive Director</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#javier"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Javier Ruiz, Policy</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#ed"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Ed Johnson-Williams, Campaigns</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#lee"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Lee Maguire, Tech</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#myles"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;"
moz-do-not-send="true">Myles Jackman, Legal Director</a></li>
<li>Matthew Rice, Scotland Director</li>
<li>Slavka Bielikova, Policy Officer</li>
<li>Mike Morel, Communications Officer</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>