<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2017-w41">https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2017-w41</a> <br>
<h1 class="entry-title" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0) !important;
margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0.5em 0px 0px; line-height: 1.2em;
font-weight: normal; clear: both; font-size: 2.4em; display:
block; font-family: Rosarivo, Georgia, serif; font-style: normal;
font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal;
letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent:
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252); text-decoration-style:
initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">ORG policy
update/2017-w41</h1>
<div id="bodyContent" class="entry-content" style="font-size: 18px;
text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em; color:
rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Rosarivo, Georgia, serif;
font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal;
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing:
normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(252, 252,
252); text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
initial;">
<div id="mw-content-text" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;" lang="en">
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">This is ORG's Policy Update for the
week beginning 09/10/2017.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">If you are reading this online, you can
also subscribe to the<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/parliamentary.monitor"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">email
version or unsubscribe</a>.</p>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="ORG.E2.80.99s_work">ORG’s work</span></h3>
<ul>
<li>We’ve launched a new action asking people to email their
MEP about the ePrivacy Regulation. We are concerned about
pressure from Facebook and Google to water down the
regulation. You can get in touch with your MEP<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://action.openrightsgroup.org/tell-your-mep-strengthen-digital-privacy?pk_campaign=Email-MEP-about-ePrivacy-one"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">here</a>.</li>
<li>ORG submitted a briefing to the House of Lords before the
Second Reading of the Data Protection Bill. Read about our
concerns<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external
text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/ourwork/reports/open-rights-group-briefing-on-the-data-protection-bill-hol-second-reading"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">here</a>.</li>
<li>Save the date for ORGCon 2017 - it will take place on
Saturday 4 November at Friends House on Euston Road in
London. We have a second smaller event planned on Sunday 5
November in a different location (TBC). This year is all
about the Digital Fightback. Confirmed speakers include
Graham Linehan, Noel Sharkey, Helen Lewis, Jamie Bartlett
and Nanjira Sambuli.<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://orgcon.openrightsgroup.org/" style="color:
rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Tickets are on
sale now</a>!</li>
</ul>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Official_meetings">Official
meetings</span></h3>
<ul>
<li>Jim Killock attended a roundtable meeting about the
Internet Commission 2020.</li>
</ul>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="UK_Parliament">UK Parliament</span></h3>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Government_is_against_Article_80.282.29">Government is
against Article 80(2)</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Data Protection Bill went through
its Second Reading in the House of Lords on 10 October. Lords
predominantly outlined their positions on the Bill and
indicated areas they would like to amend.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Transcripts of the debate:<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2017-10-10a.123.3&s=%28internet+OR+cyber+OR+computer+OR+web+OR+surveillance+OR+copywrite+OR+%22data+sharing%22%29#g156.0"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">1</a>,<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2017-10-10a.169.3&s=%28internet+OR+cyber+OR+computer+OR+web+OR+surveillance+OR+copywrite+OR+%22data+sharing%22%29#g212.0"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">2</a></p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Bill will be discussed by peers in<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/dataprotection.html"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Committee
on 30 October</a>.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">ORG prepared a<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/ourwork/reports/open-rights-group-briefing-on-the-data-protection-bill-hol-second-reading"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">briefing</a><span> </span>prior
to the debate. We have argued for the need of implementing the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regulation"
title="General Data Protection Regulation" style="color:
rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">General Data
Protection Regulation</a><span> </span>Article 80(2). The
article would allow independent privacy bodies to bring
complaints on behalf of consumers without the need of a named
data subject. This provision could be instrumental in
investigating harmful data processing practices.</p>
During the debate, Article 80(2) received cross-party support
from various peers, however, the Government indicated that they
do not intend to implement the Article into the DPBill. Instead,
Baroness Williams (on behalf of the Government) said that
<blockquote style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left;
line-height: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">“It is important to
note that not-for-profit organisations will be able to take
action on behalf of data subjects where the individuals
concerned have mandated them to do so. This is an important
new right for data subjects and should not be underestimated.”</blockquote>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Other issues discussed during the
debate included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Age of consent - difference between Scotland and the rest
of UK</li>
<li>Post-Brexit data flows and adequacy</li>
<li>Henry VIII clauses and impossibility of making the Bill
future-proof</li>
<li>Need for transparent and effective regime for assessment
of the right to be forgotten requests</li>
<li>Bill’s interaction with blockchain</li>
<li>Call for NHS patient data to be protected as a national
asset</li>
<li>Limitation for single processing for special purposes</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">There is a number of<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://privacyinternational.org/node/1524"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">other
issues</a><span> </span>in the Bill that need to be
addressed:</p>
<ul>
<li>The lack of<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external
text"
href="http://amberhawk.typepad.com/amberhawk/2017/10/dp-bills-new-immigration-exemption-can-put-eu-citizens-seeking-a-right-to-remain-at-considerable-dis.html"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">a
“representative”</a>. Originally, the EU’s General Data
Protection Regulation covers the processing of personal data
of EU data subjects by data controllers (companies) not
established in the EU. In such circumstances, the EU
requires companies who are based outside of the EU but wish
to offer services to people in the EU to establish a
representative in a Member State. Without a “representative”
it will be impossible to enforce all rights and obligations
on non-UK companies offering services to the people in the
UK if something goes wrong.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Conditions for processing special categories of personal
data - one of the conditions for processing is “substantial
public interest”, however, the Bill does not include a
definition of substantial public interest.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>National Security Certificates - provisions in the Bill
include even wider exemptions than those in the current Data
Protection Act.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Unfettered powers for cross-border transfers of personal
data by intelligence agencies without appropriate levels of
protection.</li>
</ul>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Other_national_developments">Other
national developments</span></h3>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Government_set_up_a_new_national_hate_crime_hub">Government
set up a new national hate crime hub</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Government has announced a<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home-secretary-announces-new-national-online-hate-crime-hub"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">new
national hub to tackle online hate crime</a>. The hub’s
primary aim is to improve the police response to the problem
of hate crime online.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Government aims to provide better
support for victims and increase the number of prosecutions.
Specialist officers are supposed to advise victims on how to<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/08/police-tell-social-media-firms-take-hate-posts-major-government/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">report
online hate speech to platforms hosting external content
online</a>.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The hub will allow people to report
online hate crime cases to police who will then assess them
and assign them to local forces. They will also refer
appropriate cases to online platforms hosting external content
so that hateful material can be removed. This change comes
after the<span> </span><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/20/hate-crimes-online-abusers-prosecutors-serious-crackdown-internet-face-to-face"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Crime
Prosecution Service recently committed to treating online
hate crime</a><span> </span>as seriously as offline hate
crime.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The issue of removing online hate crime
has been more prominent in the EU where the European
Commission already passed<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-1937_en.htm"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">new
rules applying to social media and Internet companies</a>.
The rules require them to remove hateful online content and
terrorist material within 24 hours of being notified. The UK
Government has not made an official statement on online hate
content regulation but will likely follow the example set by
online terrorist propaganda.</p>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="UK_to_become_the_safest_place_in_the_world_to_be_online.3F">UK
to become the safest place in the world to be online?</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The Government launched a new<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/making-britain-the-safest-place-in-the-world-to-be-online"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Internet
Safety Strategy</a>. The Strategy corresponds to the
announcements of the Digital Charter made in the Conservative
manifesto as well as the Queen’s Speech. The strategy is to
mostly regulate social media companies. The Government intends
to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Create a code of practice for social media companies to
remove or address bullying, intimidating or humiliating
online content;</li>
<li>Propose an industry-wide levy on social media companies
and communication service providers to raise awareness and
counter Internet harms.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">These measures are voluntary; however,
if the targeted companies do not get involved the Government
will consider implementing legislative measures.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">In order to form the strategy, the
Government launched a<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/internet-safety-strategy-green-paper"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">consultation</a><span> </span>that
seeks views on a social media code of practice, transparency
reporting and a social media levy, technological solutions to
online harms, developing children’s digital literacy, support
for parents, and the experience of online abuse and dating.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The implementation of a social media
levy appears to be problematic. The Government will run into
issues when trying to define who will have to pay and who
doesn't, how the rate is calculated, or enforcement of a
non-UK domiciled company. The launch of the new initiative
tightening the rules for social media companies comes at the
same time as the<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/oct/10/ofcom-patricia-hodgson-google-facebook-fake-news"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">calls
from Ofcom</a><span> </span>to reclassify social media
companies as publishers in regards to the spread of fake news.
The reclassification would make them directly responsible and
liable for the content on their platforms.</p>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Europe">Europe</span></h3>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Internet_companies_lobby_against_ePrivacy">Internet
companies lobby against ePrivacy</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The ePrivacy rules were updated in 2016
but the EU is currently<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="http://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/POLITICO-e-privacy-directive-review-draft-december.pdf"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">reviewing
them again following pressure</a>from the online advertising
industry, including corporate powerhouses such as Facebook and
Google. ePrivacy regulation is supposed to complement the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regulation"
title="General Data Protection Regulation" style="color:
rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">General Data
Protection Regulation</a><span> </span>which is due to be
implemented by the Member States by 25 May 2018.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The original proposal from the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/European_Commission"
title="European Commission" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;">European Commission</a><span> </span>is
a good starting point; however, there are still<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://edri.org/dear-meps-we-need-you-to-protect-our-privacy-online/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">issues
that need to be fixed</a>. Internet and advertising
companies (which profit from tracking) are trying to lobby the
EU to water down these changes.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">The revised ePrivacy rules are
currently debated by the European Parliament and MEPs will
vote on them soon (date to be announced). The ePrivacy is a
specialised legislation while the GDPR is a general
legislation. This means that<span> </span><a rel="nofollow"
class="external text"
href="https://iapp.org/news/a/will-the-eprivacy-reg-overshadow-the-gdpr-in-the-age-of-iot/"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">when
the two regulations contain rules for the same situation</a>,
the ePrivacy rules should take precedence. However, the
ePrivacy Regulation should not lower the level of protection
given to people under the GDPR. If this is the case, it is
likely that the issue will have to be resolved by the<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/European_Court_of_Justice"
title="European Court of Justice" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">European
Court of Justice</a><span> </span>(CJEU). The<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/CJEU"
title="CJEU" class="mw-redirect" style="color: rgb(0, 80,
156); text-decoration: none;">CJEU</a><span> </span>could
then potentially invalidate the provisions.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">It is important the revised rules:</p>
<ul>
<li>maintain the use of privacy features in browsers and apps
by default;</li>
<li>ban cookie walls preventing people from accessing websites
if they do not consent to being tracked;</li>
<li>close the loophole for collecting data by third parties
for analytics;</li>
<li>remove any language legitimising corporate surveillance.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">You can contact your MEP<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://action.openrightsgroup.org/tell-your-mep-strengthen-digital-privacy?pk_campaign=Email-MEP-about-ePrivacy-one"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">here</a>.</p>
<h3><span class="mw-headline"
id="Questions_in_the_UK_Parliament">Questions in the UK
Parliament</span></h3>
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Question_on_catfishing">Question
on catfishing</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Ann_Coffey_MP"
title="Ann Coffey MP" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;">Ann Coffey MP</a><span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-09-14.105382.h&s=%28internet+OR+cyber+OR+computer+OR+web+OR+surveillance+OR+copywrite+OR+%22data+sharing%22%29#g105382.r0"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">asked</a><span> </span>the
Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what
discussions the department has had on measures dealing with
catfishing in the Internet Safety Strategy.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Matthew_Hancock_MP"
title="Matthew Hancock MP" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;">Matthew Hancock MP</a><span> </span>responded
that they will consider ways in which we can ensure Britain is
the safest place in the world to be online.</p>
<h4><span class="mw-headline" id="Question_on_cybercrime">Question
on cybercrime</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">John Trickett<span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-09-14.105229.h&s=Digital+Government#g105229.r0"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">asked</a><span> </span>the
Secretary of State for Health, whether the department requires
contractors to have obtained a certificate from the Government
Cyber Essentials scheme.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;">Phillip Dunne responded that suppliers
are only required to demonstrate that they meet the technical
requirements prescribed by Cyber Essentials for those
contracts involving the transfer of sensitive data. There is
no general requirement for all suppliers to achieve Cyber
Essentials certification.</p>
<h4><span class="mw-headline"
id="Question_on_.E2.80.9Cdenial_of_service.E2.80.9D_attacks">Question
on “denial of service” attacks</span></h4>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Chi_Onwurah_MP"
title="Chi Onwurah MP" class="mw-redirect" style="color:
rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Chi Onwurah MP</a><span> </span><a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-09-14.105256.h&s=Digital+Government#g105256.q0"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">asked</a><span> </span>the
Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what
steps they have been taking to improve public and private
sector organisations' protection against distributed “denial
of service” attacks.</p>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Matthew_Hancock_MP"
title="Matthew Hancock MP" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;">Matthew Hancock MP</a><span> </span>responded
that the department is considering the need for the right
incentives to be in place to build security into
internet-connected products and services to help protect
devices from being hijacked.</p>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="ORG_media_coverage">ORG media
coverage</span></h3>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><i>See<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_Press_Coverage"
title="ORG Press Coverage" style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156);
text-decoration: none;">ORG Press Coverage</a><span> </span>for
full details.</i></p>
<dl>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-10-07-FACTS Chronicle-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://factschronicle.com/uber-app-can-secretly-spy-on-your-iphone-and-you-wont-know-5029.html"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Uber
app can secretly spy on your iPhone and you won’t know!</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Mike Hardy</dd>
<dd>Summary: Jim Killock quoted on Uber not proving itself a
trustworthy company either to regulators or consumers.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Surveillance"
title="Surveillance" class="mw-redirect" style="color:
rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Surveillance</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-10-10-World Socialist Web
Site-<a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/10/10/rudd-o10.html"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">British
government prepares further draconian legislation to
censor Internet</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Steve James</dd>
<dd>Summary: ORG mentioned in relation to our concerns about
the Law Commission’s new proposals for the Espionage Act.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Online_censorship"
title="Online censorship" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Online
censorship</a></dd>
<dt style="font-weight: bold;">2017-10-10-Wired-<a
rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="http://www.wired.co.uk/article/uk-regulate-internet-safety-regulation"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Theresa
May's next cunning plan? A levy on technology firms</a></dt>
<dd>Author: Matt Burgess</dd>
<dd>Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the need for the police to
police the Internet, not the Internet companies.</dd>
<dd>Topics:<span> </span><a
href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Online_censorship"
title="Online censorship" class="mw-redirect"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Online
censorship</a></dd>
</dl>
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="ORG_Contact_Details">ORG
Contact Details</span></h3>
<p style="font-size: 18px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Staff
page</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#jim"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Jim
Killock, Executive Director</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#javier"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Javier
Ruiz, Policy</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#ed"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Ed
Johnson-Williams, Campaigns</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#lee"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Lee
Maguire, Tech</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text"
href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#myles"
style="color: rgb(0, 80, 156); text-decoration: none;">Myles
Jackman, Legal Director</a></li>
<li>Matthew Rice, Scotland Director</li>
<li>Slavka Bielikova, Policy Officer</li>
<li>Mike Morel, Communications Officer</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>