<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="container content-width3 font-size5">
<div class="reader-header header" dir="ltr">
<a class="reader-domain domain" href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2018-w14">https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2018-w14</a>
<div class="domain-border"></div>
<h1 class="reader-title">ORG policy update/2018-w14</h1>
</div>
<hr class="">
<div class="content">
<div class="line-height4 moz-reader-content" dir="ltr"><div id="readability-page-1" class="page"><div id="bodyContent" class="">
<div id="mw-content-text" dir="ltr" lang="en" class=""><p class="">This is ORG's Policy Update for the week beginning 02/04/2018.
</p><p class="">If you are reading this online, you can also subscribe to the <a rel="nofollow" href="https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/parliamentary.monitor" class="">email version or unsubscribe</a>.
</p>
<h2 class=""><span id="ORG.E2.80.99s_work" class="">ORG’s work</span></h2>
<ul class=""><li class="">This week, ORG <a rel="nofollow" href="https://action.openrightsgroup.org/say-no-article-13s-censorship-machine" class="">sent out an action</a> to interested members about the proposed EU Copyright Filter, asking for signatures to forward to MEPs.</li>
<li class="">A number of ORG local groups are also running events around Free Speech and Extremism. The full list of events can be found <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/events/" class="">on our events page</a>.</li></ul>
<h2 class=""><span id="Official_meetings" class="">Official meetings</span></h2>
<ul class=""><li class="">Jim Killock met with Oath to discuss intermediary liability.</li>
<li class="">Jim Killock appeared on Al Jazeera's English language television
channel to discuss Facebook and the Cambridge Analytica investigation.</li></ul>
<h2 class=""><span id="UK_Parliament" class="">UK Parliament</span></h2><p class="">The Easter recess in the House of Commons began on 29 March 2018, and
will last until 16 April 2018. During this period, the House of Commons
does not conduct ordinary business, so not many developments are
expected over the coming two weeks.
</p>
<h3 class=""><span id="Data_Protection_Bill_progress_continues" class="">Data Protection Bill progress continues</span></h3><p class="">ORG continue to track the progress of the Data Protection Bill
through Parliament. After the Easter recess concludes, the Bill as
amended by the Committee will be discussed by the Commons at the Report
stage.
</p>
<h2 class=""><span id="Other_national_developments" class="">Other national developments</span></h2>
<h3 class=""><span id="House_of_Lords_Consultation_on_internet_regulation_opens" class="">House of Lords Consultation on internet regulation opens</span></h3><p class="">Last week, the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications
launched a Consultation seeking views on how to improve regulation on
the internet.
</p><p class="">According to the Consultation page:
</p>
<blockquote class=""><p class="">The Committee will explore how the regulation of the internet should
be improved, and whether specific regulation is required or whether the
existing law is adequate. The inquiry also investigates whether the
online platforms have sufficient accountability and transparency, and
whether they use fair and effective processes to moderate content.
</p><p class="">Over the course of the inquiry the Committee will hear evidence
on what information online platforms should provide to consumers about
the use of their personal data and what responsibility online platforms
should have for the content that they host.
</p>
</blockquote><p class="">The Committee is seeking to answer the following questions:
</p>
<ul class=""><li class="">Is there a need to introduce specific regulation for the internet?</li>
<li class="">What should be the legal liability of online platforms for the content that they host?</li>
<li class="">How effective, fair and transparent are online platforms in moderating content that they host?</li>
<li class="">What role should users play in establishing and maintaining online community standards for content and behaviour?</li>
<li class="">What effect will the United Kingdom leaving the European Union on the Government’s regulation of the internet?</li></ul><p class="">The Consultation can be found <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/communications-committee/inquiries/parliament-2017/the-internet-to-regulate-or-not-to-regulate/" class="">here</a>, and the deadline for responses is 11 May 2018.
</p>
<h3 class=""><span id="Government_confirms_no_intent_to_regulate_driverless_vehicles_yet" class="">Government confirms no intent to regulate driverless vehicles yet</span></h3><p class="">In response to the <a rel="nofollow" href="https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/automatedandelectricvehicles.html" class="">Automated and Electric Vehicles Bill</a> currently passing through Parliament, junior transport minister Baroness Sugg authored <a rel="nofollow" href="http://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/files/DEP2018-0254/Letter_from_Baroness_Sugg_Automated_and_Electric_Vehicles_Bill.pdf" class="">a letter to the House of Lords</a>, criticising some of the elements of the Bill before Committee stage in the House of Lords begins.
</p><p class="">In the letter, Baroness Sugg highlighted that it was unnecessary
for the Bill to grant new powers to create standards that new driverless
vehicles would have to meet, as "necessary powers already exist to
create new Motor Vehicle Construction and Use Regulations for automated
vehicles through the Road Traffic Act 1988".
</p><p class="">Baroness Sugg also discussed the "significant considerations" of
data protection and privacy with relation to the large amounts of data
generated by vehicles of this type. She noted that "it is likely that
these data recorders will be regulated on an international basis", and
that it would be "against UK interests to act unilaterally before
decisions have been taken".
</p>
<h2 class=""><span id="International_developments" class="">International developments</span></h2>
<h3 class=""><span id="US_Government_asks_Supreme_Court_to_drop_Microsoft_v_USA_email_privacy_challenge" class="">US Government asks Supreme Court to drop Microsoft v USA email privacy challenge</span></h3><p class="">The US Government this week asked the Supreme Court to drop a <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/legal/email-privacy-challenge" class="">long-running challenge</a>
against Microsoft which attempted to force them to disclose the
contents of a person's email inbox stored on servers located in Ireland.
Last Friday, the US Department of Justice submitted a 16-page court
filing, requesting dismissal of the case and describing it as "moot".
</p><p class="">The Supreme Court had heard arguments in the case as recently as
February 2018, but with the recent passage of the highly controversial <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/cloud-act-dangerous-expansion-police-snooping-cross-border-data" class="">Clarifying Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act</a>,
American and foreign law enforcement powers were expanded to allow them
to access to data stored internationally or in other territories.
</p><p class="">ORG had previously signed a joint Amicus briefing in the case with <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.digitalrights.ie/" class="">Digital Rights Ireland</a>, and were hoping for a Supreme Court ruling supporting Microsoft's refusal to disclose the contents of the customer's inbox.
</p>
<h2 class=""><span id="Questions_in_the_UK_Parliament" class="">Questions in the UK Parliament</span></h2>
<h3 class=""><span id="Question_about_Police_accessing_data_on_mobile_phones" class="">Question about Police accessing data on mobile phones</span></h3><p class="">Lord Scriven made reference to <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.privacyinternational.org/campaigns/phone-data-extraction" class="">Privacy International's recent campaign</a> on phone data extraction, by asking:
</p>
<ul class=""><li class="">"what national rules are in place concerning police officers accessing individuals' personal mobile phone data";</li>
<li class="">"what assessment [the Government] have made of whether police
officers should be prevented from accessing individuals' personal mobile
phone data without a search warrant"; and</li>
<li class="">"whether the police can retain data downloaded from the mobile
phones of those who have been arrested but not charged; and if so, why."</li></ul><p class="">Baroness Williams of Trafford <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2018-03-27.HL6715.r0" class="">answered</a>, stating:
</p>
<blockquote class="">Current legislation, principally provisions in the Police
and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, allow data to be accessed from a mobile
device when there are reasonable grounds to believe it contains evidence
of an offence, but only then in adherence with data protection and
human rights obligations.
<p class="">Data obtained and downloaded from a mobile device belonging to a
person arrested, but not charged, may be retained for forensic
examination or as evidential material in an ongoing criminal
investigation. The data may only be retained for as long as is
necessary.
</p><p class="">There are no plans to change this legislation.
</p>
The police are operationally independent of the Home Office and the use
of their powers to investigate crime, including operational guidance, is
a matter for them.</blockquote>
<h3 class=""><span id="Question_on_intellectual_property_rights_post-Brexit" class="">Question on intellectual property rights post-Brexit</span></h3><p class="">Marsha de Cordova asked the Secretary of State for Business, Energy
and Industrial Strategy whether the Government would "ensure that the
same level of rights under the EU unregistered designs regime is
maintained in the UK after the UK leaves the EU."
</p><p class="">Sam Gyimah <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2018-03-21.133578.r0" class="">responded</a>
that "as stated in the UK Technical Note on 'Other Separation Issues' –
where the UK does not have existing domestic legislation to protect
certain types of rights, it will establish new schemes. This will
preserve the full scope of the unregistered Community design right in
the UK".
</p>
<h2 class=""><span id="ORG_media_coverage" class="">ORG media coverage</span></h2><p class=""><i class="">See <a href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_Press_Coverage" title="ORG Press Coverage" class="">ORG Press Coverage</a> for full details.</i>
</p>
<dl class=""><dt class="">2018-04-06-BBC News-<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43571809" class="">iPhone update adds privacy 'transparency'</a></dt>
<dd class="">Author: BBC News</dd>
<dd class="">Summary: Jim Killock quoted in a story about Apple adding improved
privacy controls to their iOS operating system for mobile phones.</dd>
<dd class="">Topics: <a href="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Privacy" title="Privacy" class="">Privacy</a></dd></dl>
<h2 class=""><span id="ORG_Staff_Details" class="">ORG Staff Details</span></h2><p class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff" class="">Staff Contact Page</a>
</p>
<ul class=""><li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:jim@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Jim Killock</a></b>, Executive Director</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:javier@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Javier Ruiz</a></b>, Policy Director</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:martha@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Martha Dark</a></b>, Chief Operations Officer</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:matthew@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Matthew Rice</a></b>, Scotland Director</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:myles@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Myles Jackman</a></b>, Legal Director</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:mike@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Mike Morel</a></b>, Campaign Manager</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:ed@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Ed Johnson-Williams</a></b>, Policy and Research Officer</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:slavka@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Slavka Bielikova</a></b>, Policy Officer</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:alex.haydock@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Alex Haydock</a></b>, Legal Officer</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:caitlin@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Caitlin Bishop</a></b>, Campaign Communication Officer</li>
<li class=""><b class=""><a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:lee@openrightsgroup.org" class="">Lee Maguire</a></b>, Tech</li></ul></div></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>