[ORG PM] ORG policy update - 18 November 2016

[ORG Policy Monitoring]

> 
> https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2016-w46 <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2016-w46>
> 
> ORG policy update/2016-w46
> This is ORG's Policy Update for the week beginning 14/11/2016.
> 
> If you are reading this online, you can also subscribe to the email version <https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/parliamentary.monitor>.
> 
> ORG's work
> 
> ORG has launched a petition against censorship of legal content on erotica and pornography websites. Our petition is a response to a proposal from several MPs to block websites which don't comply with age verification. Blocking websites is a disproportionate, technical response to a social issue. Sign our petition <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/campaigns/digital-economy-bill-hub/stop-uk-censorship-of-legal-content> and reject proposals for censorship of legal content in the UK.
> We released a new video to go with our petition. You can watch MPs calling for censorship of legal content here <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-uh1VPYEbE>.
> Planned local group events:
> 
> Come to the first of our series of talks given by members of the ORG Hampshire community. We'll be kicking off on 22 November with a session on Open Data <http://www.meetup.com/ORG-Hampshire/events/235438710/> what local datasets already exist, what's wrong with them and what we can do to help.
> Come along to ORG Birmingham's free Mozilla Maker Party <http://www.meetup.com/ORG-Birmingham/events/235381531/> on 22 November to make illicit digital culture with artist Antonio Roberts and learn more about what you can do to achieve real, progressive changes in copyright.
> ORG Aberdeen is organising a Cryptonoise meeting <https://www.meetup.com/ORG-Aberdeen/events/235022854/> on 24 November. Learn how you can help to protect your rights in a digital world. You do not need to be a tech wizard to attend.
> Official meetings
> 
> Pam Cowburn attended a meeting at the Department for Education regarding collection of pupils' personal information.
> Javier Ruiz and Jim Killock attended a meeting at the Cabinet Office regarding DEBill amendments on Codes of Practice for Data Sharing.
> Parliament
> 
> IPBill
> 
> The Investigatory Powers Bill completed all its parliamentary stages in both houses <http://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/11/investigatory-powers-act-imminent-peers-clear-path-for-uk-super-snoop-law/> on 16 November. The Bill is now awaiting Royal Assent and is expected to become an Act of Parliament before the end of 2016 and before sun sets on DRIPA <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/DRIPA>.
> 
> The IPBill went back to the House of Commons on 15 November <https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2016-11-15/debates/354A9B4B-BB6E-466A-A4CF-DA9CD5DDD7D2/InvestigatoryPowersBill> where the situation from last week was repeated again. Labour MPs argued for including amendments on press regulation by Baroness Hollins in the Bill. The Government’s majority pushed for the amendments to not be part of the Bill.
> 
> When the Bill reached the House of Lords again on 16 November <https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2016-11-16/debates/5F4DA1AE-4587-4FE2-BEBE-055CF45A695C/InvestigatoryPowersBill> with explanation from the House of Commons why they rejected the amendments, Lords finally agreed to their changes.
> 
> The IPBill was scrupulously scrutinised throughout its passage by civil society groups. A coalition of privacy campaigners, Don’t Spy On Us, said in a statement <https://www.dontspyonus.org.uk/blog/2016/11/17/parliament-passes-most-extreme-surveillance-law-in-uk-history/> that
> “The UK Government has failed to respond to widespread public dismay over secret mass surveillance revealed by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013. The Bill will not only put into statute the capabilities revealed by Snowden but extend surveillance even further.”
> The passage of the IPBill lacked opposition from Labour. Thus the Bill, soon to be the Investigatory Powers Act, in its final form will still have an immense effect on our right to privacy, right to freedom of expression, investigative journalism, the security of the Internet and intelligence sharing.
> 
> There remain several legal actions that will have an impact on the Bill. The UK’s legal bulk surveillance regime is being challenged in two cases at the ECHR <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ECHR> and the data retention is being questioned in the UK and EU courts in the Watson challenge. Both courts could place further demands for safeguards and restraints on the UK surveillance regime.
> 
> This week Baroness Jones <http://www.parliament.uk/biographies/lords/baroness-jones-of-moulsecoomb/4297> looked at what impact surveillance powers in the IPBill and the Trump presidency could have on people’s lives in her blog <https://jennyjones.org/2016/11/15/trump-will-know-everything-about-you-that-our-government-knows/>.
> 
> DEBill
> 
> The Report stage for the DEBill has been set for 28 November. A list of amendments due to be debated can be found here <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2016-2017/0087/amend/digital_rm_rep_1117.1-7.html>.
> 
> One of the most worrying amendment proposals submitted thus far is the amendment supported by a cross bench group of MPs regarding ISP blocking of non-compliant erotica and porn websites. This proposal is a deeply disproportionate measure. At the moment, MPs’ proposal does not have the Government’s backing. However, there is a possibility that Tory and Labour MPs will come together and defeat the Government; especially since Labour tabled a very similar amendment themselves previously.
> 
> ORG has started a petition to give to MPs to demonstrate how disengaged from the reality of the Internet this proposal is. You can sign the petition here <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/campaigns/digital-economy-bill-hub/stop-uk-censorship-of-legal-content>. You can also watch a video of MPs trying to argue in favour of censorship of legal material here <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-uh1VPYEbE>.
> 
> The amendment seeks to require blocking of access to pornographic material by Internet service providers. The age-verification regulator (BBFC) will be able to issue notices to ISPs to block access to non-complying porn publishers which will inevitably lead to a form of censorship.
> 
> Jim Killock explains <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2016/let-them-block-porn> in detail why these measures are neither effective nor proportionate.
> 
> The whole concept of age verification remains flawed. Just earlier this week there have been reports of a hack of one of the biggest adult websites <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37974266> Adult Friend Finder. Up to 400 million customer logins have been leaked. This instance further illustrates the negative consequences of creating data about porn users <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2016/a-database-of-the-uks-porn-habits-what-could-possibly-go-wrong>.
> 
> Question on data protection
> 
> Chi Onwurah MP <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Chi_Onwurah_MP> asked <https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2016-11-07.52123.h&s=%28internet+OR+cyber+OR+computer+OR+web+OR+surveillance+OR+copywrite+OR+%22data+sharing%22%29#g52123.r0> the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what is being done to improve consumer awareness of the privacy, security and fraud implications of sharing personal data online. Onwurah followed up with a question asking how people can mitigate such risks.
> 
> Matthew Hancock MP <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Matthew_Hancock_MP>, Minister for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, responded that the ICO is responsible for producing a guidance on information rights. Hancock referred consumers to the ICO's website to find out how to mitigate the risks associated with sharing data.
> 
> Question on cybercrime
> 
> Marquess of Lothian <http://www.parliament.uk/biographies/lords/marquess-of-lothian/259> asked <https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2016-11-01.HL2910.h&s=cyber#gHL2910.r0> the Government how many additional experts are estimated to be needed to implement the National Cyber Security Strategy. He also asked what is being done to encourage young people to study computer sciences at university level.
> 
> Lord Ashton of Hyde <https://www.parliament.uk/biographies/lords/lord-ashton-of-hyde/4247> responded that the National Cyber Security Strategy for 2016-2020 outlines the government's ambition to deliver a self-sustaining skills to meet the needs for the public and private sector.
> 
> Question on national identity cards
> 
> Lords engaged in a discussion on identity cards after Lord Campbell-Savours asked <https://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2016-11-16a.1421.6&s=%28internet+OR+cyber+OR+computer+OR+web+OR+surveillance+OR+copywrite+OR+%22data+sharing%22%29#g1422.1> whether the Government intend to consult the National Police Chiefs’ Council on the matter.
> 
> Baroness Williams of Trafford responded that the Government have no intentions of reintroducing the scheme of identity cards.
> 
> Statement on EU-US Umbrella Agreement
> 
> Matthew Hancock MP <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Matthew_Hancock_MP> made a statement <https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wms/?id=2016-11-16.HCWS262.h&s=%22data+protection%22#gHCWS262.0> regarding the Government’s participation in negotiations for the EU-US Umbrella Agreement dealing with the data protection framework for criminal law enforcement operations.
> 
> Hancock clarified that decisions on the signature text of the Umbrella Agreement were made by the Council of Ministers before UK Parliament could compete the process of scrutiny on the agreement. The UK voted in favour of the final version of the agreement.
> 
> Other national developments
> 
> Lauri Love to be extradited
> 
> The Home SecretaryAmber Rudd MP <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Amber_Rudd_MP> approved the US request for extradition <https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/nov/14/amber-rudd-approves-lauri-love-extradition-to-us-on-hacking-charges> of Lauri Love. Love faces the accusation of hacking into several US government agencies and could face up to 99 years in prison according to his lawyers.
> 
> Previously, Love lost his legal challenge in September when the district judge, Nina Tempia, ruled that there are no reasons to believe that Love would not be appropriately cared for in US prison system. Love’s defence argued that because of him having Asperger syndrome, depression and eczema he is likely to be driven towards suicide. This would be especially the case in the US prison system which has considerably worse facilities for prisoners with mental health issues.
> 
> The case of Lauri Love has been compared to that of Gary McKinnon <https://www.theguardian.com/world/blog/2012/oct/16/gary-mckinnon-extradition-decision-live>, whose extradition was blocked by the then Home Secretary Theresa May in 2012. McKinnon has publicly shown his support to Love in this article <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/15/theresa-may-saved-my-life-human-rights-act>.
> 
> Europe
> 
> Facebook stops data sharing with WhatsApp across Europe
> 
> Data sharing in European countries between WhatsApp <https://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/11/facebook-pauses-whatsapp-data-sharing-uk-ico-threatens-action/> and its parent company Facebook has been stopped. The social media company first stopped the flow of data in the UK following the ICO </wiki/ICO>’s investigation into their practices.
> 
> TheICO <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ICO> found that the two companies had failed to seek valid consent from its users. As a response to the regulatory pressure, Facebook halted its data cooperation with WhatsApp in the UK two weeks ago.
> 
> The data sharing has been stopped for advertising purposes but the two companies are still sharing information to fight spam.
> 
> Facebook commented on their recent actions:
> "We hope to continue our detailed conversations with the UK Information Commissioner’s Office and other data protection officials, and we remain open to working collaboratively to address their questions."
> More privacy and safety rules for drones
> 
> The European Parliament </wiki/European_Parliament>’s transport committee approved changes to aviation safety rules for drones <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20161107STO50307/drones-new-eu-rules-to-ensure-safety-and-privacy>. MEPs would like to implement mandatory registration of drones that weigh more than 250 grams. Their aim is to enshrine requirements for civil drones in EU legislation to provide more clarity and coherence for the sake of security and privacy. The new rules are said to not affect “toy” drones.
> 
> ORG media coverage
> 
> See ORG Press Coverage <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_Press_Coverage> for full details.
> 
> 2016-11-11-New Scientist-Trump’s election stokes fears of future NSA surveillance abuses <https://www.newscientist.com/article/2112521-trumps-election-stokes-fears-of-future-nsa-surveillance-abuses/>
> Author: Aviva Rutkin
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on UK's reliance on US technology and data having a potential impact on UK's sovereignty.
> 2016-11-11-The Guardian-Privacy experts fear Donald Trump running global surveillance network <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/11/trump-surveillance-network-nsa-privacy>
> Author: Spencer Ackerman & Ewen MacAskill
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on UK's reliance on US technology and data having a potential impact on UK's sovereignty.
> 2016-11-11-Pune Mirror-How much snooping is too much? <http://www.punemirror.indiatimes.com/others/scitech/How-much-snooping-is-too-much/articleshow/55357058.cms>
> Summary: Pam Cowburn quoted on the problematic nature of using non-financial data to determine financial decision without transparent criteria.
> 2016-11-14-Boing Boing-Petition: don't add all adult sites to the British national internet censorlist <https://boingboing.net/2016/11/14/petition-dont-add-all-adult.html>
> Author: Cory Doctorow
> Summary: ORG's petition against censoring of legal pornographic content quoted.
> 2016-11-16-Forbes-UK Joins Russia And China In Legalizing Bulk Surveillance <http://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2016/11/16/uk-joins-russia-and-china-in-legalizing-bulk-surveillance/#1bee36ee65f4>
> Author: Emma Woollacott
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 
> 2016-11-17-Telecompaper-Investigatory Powers Bill passes House of Lords <http://www.telecompaper.com/news/investigatory-powers-bill-passes-by-house-of-lords--1172312>
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 2016-11-17-ZDNet-Britain has passed the 'most extreme surveillance law ever passed in a democracy' <http://www.zdnet.com/article/snoopers-charter-expansive-new-spying-powers-becomes-law/>
> Author: Zack Whittaker
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 2016-11-17-Tech Crunch-UK parliament rubberstamps mass surveillance law <https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/17/uk-parliament-rubberstamps-mass-surveillance-law/>
> Author: Natasha Lomas
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 2016-11-17-The Inquirer-Privacy groups slam parliamentary passing of 'draconian' IP Bill <http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2477558/privacy-groups-slam-parliamentary-passing-of-draconian-ip-bill>
> Author: Carly Page
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 2016-11-17-Yahoo-U.K.’s Investigatory Powers law gives police wide-ranging snooping powers <https://www.yahoo.com/music/u-k-investigatory-powers-law-185513000.html>
> Author: Jonathan Keane
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 2016-11-17-Tom's Hardware-Snoopers' Charter, UK’s Most Privacy Invasive Law Passed By Parliament <http://www.tomshardware.com/news/snoopers-charter-passes-uk-parliament,33050.html>
> Author: Lucien Armasu
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 2016-11-17-Techspot-UK's Snooper's Charter approved by parliament, set to become law in next few weeks <http://www.techspot.com/news/67086-uk-snooper-charter-approved-parliament-set-become-law.html>
> Author: Rob Thubron
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 2016-11-17-Tech Week Europe-Snooper’s Charter 2.0 Is Set To Become Law As Lords Pass Controversial IP Bill <http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/security/ip-bill-house-of-lords-200817>
> Author:Steve McCaskill
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 2016-11-18-V3-Privacy groups slam government for passing Snoopers' Charter <https://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2477717/privacy-groups-slam-government-for-passing-snoopers-charter>
> Author: Carly Page
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> 2016-11-18-CBR Online-As IP Bill becomes law, what does the Snoopers Charter mean for your business? <http://www.cbronline.com/news/verticals/central-government/ip-bill-becomes-law-snoopers-charter-mean-business/>
> Author: Alexander Sword
> Summary: ORG mentioned in connection with the IPBill having an impact on businesses not being able to meet the standards of data protection.
> 2016-11-18-Bit-Tech-Open Rights Group vows to fight new IP Law <http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/2016/11/18/org-to-fight-ip-law/1?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bit-tech%2Fnews+(bit-tech.net+News+Feed)>
> Author: Gareth Halfacree
> Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the IPBill being used by authoritarian regimes with poor human rights records to justify their own intrusive surveillance powers.
> ORG Contact Details
> 
> Staff page <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff>
> 
> Jim Killock, Executive Director <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#jim>
> Javier Ruiz, Policy <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#javier>
> Ed Johnson-Williams, Campaigns <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#ed>
> Pam Cowburn, Communications <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#pam>
> Lee Maguire, Tech <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#lee>
> Myles Jackman, Legal Director <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#myles>
> Charlie Tunmore, Supporter Officer <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#charlie>
> Slavka Bielikova, Policy Officer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openrightsgroup.org/pipermail/parliamentary.monitor/attachments/20161118/b5668e99/attachment.html>