[ORG PM] ORG policy update 17 November 2017
Slavka Bielikova
policy.monitoring at openrightsgroup.org
Fri Nov 17 13:47:09 GMT 2017
https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_policy_update/2017-w46
ORG policy update/2017-w46 - ORG Wiki
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is ORG's Policy Update for the week beginning 13/11/2017.
If you are reading this online, you can also subscribe to the email
version or unsubscribe
<https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/parliamentary.monitor>.
ORG’s work
* ORG is running a petition against the Government’s proposals to
criminalise repeated viewing of online terrorist propaganda and
compelling internet companies to police their own networks. [ORG
started a petition against the Government’s proposals to criminalise
repeated viewing of online terrorist propaganda and compelling
internet companies to police their own networks. Sign the petition
here!
<https://action.openrightsgroup.org/censorship-and-control-are-not-answer-extremism>
* In case you couldn’t come to ORGCon, you can now watch the talks
online! Have a look at our YouTube channel
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6VTrBpE_kA&list=PLY9gENnF8uiXdeFQtEA-Ge0pd7DtAsx4T>.
Planned local group events:
* Join ORG Birmingham
<https://www.meetup.com/ORG-Birmingham/events/244878819/> on Monday
20 November to learn more about internet filtering in the UK and how
you can use the Blocked! tool to help fight the overblocking of
websites.
* ORG Edinburhgh
<https://www.meetup.com/ORG-Edinburgh/events/244894783/> is
organising a social with ORG’s Policy Director Javier Ruiz on
Tuesday 21 November. Join them to discuss some of the work he is
leading on, catch up on other areas of work, and discuss news and
topics of interest.
* Join ORG Cambridge
<https://www.meetup.com/ORG-Cambridge/events/244927140/> on Tuesday
5 December for a monthly meetup. They will discuss the current state
of digital rights, what they've done in the past month, and what
they are planning to do in the upcoming months.
* ORG Glasgow <https://www.meetup.com/ORG-Glasgow/events/244234443/>
will hold their monthly meetup on Thursday 7 December at the
Electron Club. You will have an opportunity to discuss current
affairs and topics of interest and to generate new ideas for public
events and presentations.
Official meetings
* Javier Ruiz attended an event on the Current issues in SDO
decision-making for the Internet in Parliament.
<http://www.internetpolicystreams.com/index.php/project-activities/item/357-project-workshop-2017-current-issues-in-sdo-decision-making-for-the-internet>
UK Parliament
DPBill debate in the HoL Committee continues
The Data Protection Bill (DPBill) was debated in the House of Lords
again this week during two sittings. The next Committee sittings are
scheduled for Monday 20 November and Wednesday 22 November.
The full list of amendments to be debated next week can be found here
<https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2017-2019/0066/18066-V.pdf>.
The debate this week started with Lords debating these sets of
amendments 1
<https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2017-2019/0066/18066-III%28Rev%29.pdf>
& 2
<https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2017-2019/0066/18066-IV.pdf>.
The full transcript is available from here:
* 13 November-1
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2017-11-13b.1804.1&s=data+protection+bill#g1828.2>,
2
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2017-11-13b.1849.3&s=data+protection+bill#g1878.0>,
3
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2017-11-13b.1898.0&s=data+protection+bill#g1917.4>
* 15 November
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2017-11-15a.2031.4&s=data+protection+bill#g2088.4>
This Committee debated an amendment
<http://lordsamendments.parliament.uk/?Session=2017-2019&Id=2158&Stage=Committee&Decision=Not-yet-debated&ResultsPerPage=20&Member=1879&CurrentPage=1>
tabled by Lord Lucas relating to the processing of personal data under
Part 3 of the Digital Economy Act 2017
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act_2017>
(DEAct). ORG has raised previously concerns about the lack of privacy
safeguards in the DEAct and the lack of regulation of age verification
providers under Part 3.
Lord Stevenson (Labour) pointed out that implementing
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2017-11-13b.1849.3#g1853.0>
this amendment would require resolution of many intricacies. He asked
the Minister, Lord Ashton of Hyde to clarify the situation on age
verification in the DEAct and provide information on the guidance to be
issued by the Secretary of State regarding privacy safeguards. The
amendment was withdrawn and can still be brought for discussion at later
stages.
An amendment that would remove exemption on the processing of data for
immigration purposes has gathered a cross-party support
<https://goo.gl/9KSpCk> during the debate. Baroness Williams of Trafford
stated that this provision is a necessary and proportionate measure to
protect the integrity of the immigration system. She will provide
further information in writing on the application of the clause in
practice.
Amendments on the implementation of Article 80(2) allowing independent
privacy bodies represent data subject without naming them will likely be
debated during the Committee sittings next week.
At the moment, Labour and Lib Dems tabled their amendments
<https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2017-2019/0066/18066%28f%29.pdf>
that would implement Article 80(2).
Both amendments are supported by Lib Dems and Labour
<https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2017-2019/0066/18066-V.pdf>,
however Amendment 184 would cover both processing of data which applies
under the General Data Protection Regulation and outside of it, but
amendment 185 only covers the processing of data under the GDPR.
DPBill scrutiny by the Joint Committee on Human Rights
The Joint Committee on Human Rights is scrutinising the DPBill. The
Committee is taking written evidence. You can submit your contribution
here
<http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/human-rights-committee/legislative-scrutiny/parliament-2017/data-protection-bill-17-19-/joint-written-submission-form/>.
Other national developments
Consultation on draft codes of practice for RIPA
The Home Office published a consultation of revised codes of practice of
the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
<https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/regulation-of-investigatory-powers-act-2000-draft-codes-of-practice>.
The consultation relates to Parts 2 and 3 of RIPA.
These codes set out the processes and safeguards governing the use of
investigatory powers by public authorities, including the police and
security and intelligence agencies. The consultation seeks
representation on their revised draft.
The consultation closes on 28 December at 11:45 pm.
Europe
Schrems cannot rely on his consumer status for a class action
The Advocate General Michal Bobek gave his opinion
<http://www.europe-v-facebook.org/sk/GA_opinion.pdf> in a case brought
forward by Max Schrems against Facebook. Schrems started a legal action
against Facebook following Snowden’s revelations of the US surveillance
programs.
It became apparent that data transferred by Facebook from their base in
Ireland to the US does not have adequate protections in both countries.
As a result, the Safe Harbour data sharing agreement was invalidated and
replaced by Privacy Shield.
In the current case, Schrems seeks to represent 25,000 of Facebook users
in a collective (class) action in an Austrian court
<https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-eu-privacy-facebook-court/austrian-cant-file-facebook-class-action-suit-eu-court-adviser-idUKKBN1DE100>
demanding 500 euros per person in damages.
The opinion by the Advocate General Bobek says that Schrems can rely on
his consumer status to sue Facebook Ireland before the Austrian Courts;
however, he
”cannot rely on his consumer status with respect to claims assigned
to him by other consumers.”
Opinions of advocate general are not binding for the European Court of
Justice
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/European_Court_of_Justice> (CJEU)
but are predominantly followed by the Court. If the court makes a
decision in line with the opinion, it is likely that individual privacy
suits against Facebook will not be brought forward due to high court
costs. However, Schrems would still be able to set a precedent.
Questions in the UK Parliament
Question on Internet and Terrorism
Jim Shannon asked
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-11-02.111009.h&s=internet#g111009.r0>
the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps
they are taking to prevent online subscription to websites with Islamic
extremist content.
Matthew Hancock MP
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Matthew_Hancock_MP> responded
that they are closely working with industry to encourage companies to
develop innovative solutions to tackle online radicalisation. The
Department is also setting up a new Commission for Countering Extremism
to identify whether more powers are needed.
Question on pupils’ personal records
Darren Jones asked
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-10-23.109014.h&s=%22data+protection%22#g109014.q0>
the Secretary of State for Education, what legal advice the Department
has received on meeting data protection requirements for data held on
the national pupil database that relates to former pupils with whom
schools have no contact.
Nick Gibb responded that the Department seeks advice as necessary.
Question on intellectual property
Ben Lake MP asked
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-11-02.111049.h&s=%22intellectual+property%22#g111049.r0>
the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy,
what representations they have had from the Design, Trade Marks and
Brands sectors on the future of the UK’s relationship with the
Intellectual Property Office and the EU Intellectual Property Office
after Brexit.
Jo Johnson MP <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Jo_Johnson_MP>
responded that they have held extensive discussions with representatives
from across the various IP sectors. The future relationship is a matter
for negotiation with the EU. In the meantime, the UK will continue to
fulfil their obligations under the WIPO Treaties.
Question on patents
Barry Gardiner MP
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Barry_Gardiner_MP> asked
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-11-03.111264.h&s=patent#g111264.r0>
the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy,
whether the UK will participate in the European Unitary Patent and the
EU Unified Patent Court after the UK leaves the EU.
Jo Johnson MP <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Jo_Johnson_MP>
responded that The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is an international court.
It is not an EU court or an EU institution.
Question on data protection
Paul Blomfield MP
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Paul_Blomfield_MP> asked
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-11-07.112162.h&s=Information+Commissioner+ICO#g112162.r0>
the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what
support the Department is providing for small and medium-sized
enterprises to prepare for the implementation of the Data Protection
Bill and the General Data Protection Regulation
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regulation>.
Matthew Hancock MP
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Matthew_Hancock_MP> responded
that the Information Commissioner’s Office has various resources on
their website. This month the ICO has launched a dedicated helpline
service for SMEs and has updated its SME toolkit to reflect the
requirements of GDPR.
Question on the NHS hack
Emily Thornberry MP
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Emily_Thornberry_MP> asked
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-11-06.111672.h&s=cyber#g111672.r0>
the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what
assessment they have made of the recent claim by the head of Microsoft
that the Government of North Korea was responsible for the WannaCry
cyber attack in May 2017.
Boris Johnson MP
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Boris_Johnson_MP> responded that
various sources have attributed the WannaCry campaign to North Korean
actors. The National Crime Agency and the National Cyber Security Centre
are working with international law enforcement and industry partners to
find those responsible.
Question on Internet safety
Lord Alton of Liverpool asked
<https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2017-10-31.HL2764.h&s=Digital+Government#gHL2777.q1>
the Government, why the Government’s Internet Security Strategy Green
Paper does not address the issue of definitions. Furthermore, he
inquired why using the definition of violence against women from the
Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 in the Digital Economy Act
2017 <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act_2017> is
not addressed in the Internet Safety Strategy Green Paper. Lord Ashton
of Hyde responded that Part 3 of the Digital Economy Act (2017) requires
the Secretary of State for Digital Culture, Media and Sport to produce a
report on the effectiveness of age verification measures 12 months after
the powers come into force. We will use this review to consider the
wider impact and consult on the definitions used in this part of the Act.
ORG media coverage
/See ORG Press Coverage
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/ORG_Press_Coverage> for full
details./
2017-11-10-Huffington Post-25 Million UK Porn Viewers At Risk Of Their
Sexual Preferences Being Leaked
<http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/myles-jackman/25-million-uk-porn-viewer_b_18490658.html>
Author: Myles Jackman
Summary: Op-ed by Myles Jackman on age verification and privacy threats.
Topics: Privacy <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Privacy>,
Data protection
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Data_protection>, Digital
Economy Act 2017
<https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Digital_Economy_Act_2017>
2017-11-14-The Register-Privacy Pass protocol promises private perusing
<https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/14/privacy_pass_protocol/>
Author: Rebecca Hill
Summary: Jim Killock quoted on methods to remove cookie tracking
being a great idea.
Topics: Privacy <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Privacy>
2017-11-15-Business Insider-Two UK supermarkets are trialling facial
recognition at the checkout so you can buy alcohol faster
<http://uk.businessinsider.com/uk-supermarkets-trialling-facial-recognition-yoti-tills-alcohol-2017-11>
Author: Shona Ghosh
Summary: Jim Killock quoted on the use of biometrics for everyday
security being a worrying trend.
Topics: Biometrics <https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Biometrics>
ORG Contact Details
Staff page <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff>
* Jim Killock, Executive Director
<https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#jim>
* Javier Ruiz, Policy
<https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#javier>
* Ed Johnson-Williams, Campaigns
<https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#ed>
* Lee Maguire, Tech <https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#lee>
* Myles Jackman, Legal Director
<https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#myles>
* Matthew Rice, Scotland Director
<https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#matthew>
* Slavka Bielikova, Policy Officer
<https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#slavka>
* Mike Morel, Campaigner
<https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#mike>
* Caitlin Bishop, Campaigns Communication Officer
<https://www.openrightsgroup.org/people/staff#caitlin>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openrightsgroup.org/pipermail/parliamentary.monitor/attachments/20171117/602c8b61/attachment.html>
More information about the Parliamentary.monitor
mailing list